4 upcoming Mets free agents who have been good but don't need to be re-signed

These four upcoming Mets free agents have had their moments in 2024. However, none are musts when it comes to a new deal.

New York Mets v San Diego Padres
New York Mets v San Diego Padres / Denis Poroy/GettyImages
1 of 4
Next

The New York Mets will have a heavy crop of free agents after the 2024 season. Adding several rentals at the trade deadline along with the players they already had in-house will give a whole lot of players on expiring contracts. This doesn’t include players they’ll non-tender or possible options for the 2025 season like the one Sean Manaea has.

Some of the upcoming free agents they Mets have are easy to part with. Goodbye Adam Ottavino. Farewell, Jose Quintana. What about the ones doing well that are a bit more debatable?

As important as these four have been for the Mets in 2024, there isn’t as great of a need to bring any of them back at the price, the number of years, or role they’d be asking for.

1) The Mets don’t need to re-sign Harrison Bader

Harrison Bader is playing to the back of his baseball card. Superb defense, some timely hitting, and a great attitude have helped make him a successful Mets free agent signing. As well as he has done at times, Bader doesn’t need to get an invite back for 2025.

When Bader gets cold, he seems to get really cold. Following an impressive first half that saw him hitting .273/.312/.421, he has come down to earth in the second half. Finding at-bats has become increasingly difficult as the Mets have instead chosen to use him more as a late-game defensive replacement.

Bader’s inability to draw walks is one of his more frustrating qualities. It’s a big part of his game. He has only 17 all season and 8 of them came in May.

As a fourth outfielder, Bader is perfectly fine. The defense alone will keep him on a major league roster. The Mets, with plenty of alternative options in the minor leagues and even on the MLB roster with Tyrone Taylor as that fourth outfielder, don’t need to bring back Bader. He has been fine as the last hitter in the lineup. Giving some of that playing time to young players next year makes more sense especially with the kind of contract Bader will seek.

2) The Mets don’t need to re-sign Luis Severino

Luis Severino has been more like his old self this season. The injuries that plagued him in his final years with the New York Yankees haven’t held him back as a member of the 2024 Mets. At times the best starter they’ve had, he has given them some of the best pitching performances of the season. When he’s on, Sevy is someone everyone will want back. When he’s off, he’s just another guy.

Through 27 starts, Severino is 10-6 with a 3.84 ERA. An ERA+ of 103 has him just above average while his 4.25 FIP on the season says he should have a worse ERA than he actually does.

Severino has had a few big strikeout games but with a rate of only 7.7 per 9, he’s below the league average. Thanks to consistently inducing soft-contact with an 86.6mph exit velocity and hard-hit percentage of only 36.1%, Severino has been able to turn a couple of those missing strikeouts into weaker groundballs.

There was a period this season when Severino seemed like a must to bring back. Not so much anymore. It wouldn’t be a horrible decision, but we do have to draw the line somewhere. Sean Manaea has been much more consistent and dominant at his best. The Mets would be silly to bring them back both. Why not make it Manaea who is having a better year?

3) The Mets don’t need to re-sign Jesse Winker

Jesse Winker has been fun and should continue to be an important part of the Mets for the rest of the season. Should the Mets bring him back? Eh, in a similar role it could work, but why not give some of those at-bats to a player like Drew Gilbert?

Winker has a lot in common with Starling Marte. Actually having a much better defensive season as a left fielder, the idea of platooning the pair next year is likely something a whole lot of Mets fans have considered. It’s close to what the team is doing now but not exactly.

Re-signing Winker has its perks if the team does want another somewhat limited corner outfielder on the roster. They went with DJ Stewart to start this season. However, the team was looking for alternatives up until Opening Day. 

Winker is probably a better fit for the Mets if they prefer to have another lighter offseason. Assuming the club won’t revert back to having Brandon Nimmo as its everyday center fielder, Winker is less of a fit other than having a part-time role. After the season he has put together, he’ll probably want more at-bats. Clutch hits like his grand slam against the Boston Red Sox only add to the allure of what he can offer.

Before jumping to re-sign Winker, Mets fans should consider the recent lows he has experienced. He batted just .219/.344/.344 in 2022. He followed it up by hitting .199/.320/.247 in 2023.  An awesome bounce back season in 2024 won’t have teams busting down doors to obtain Winker yet there is definitely a team out there looking to play more competitively next year who’d award him a starting job.

With Winker, it comes down to where the Mets may miss in other areas and maybe even what their plan is at the DH spot. Speaking of…

4) The Mets don’t need to re-sign J.D. Martinez

J.D. Martinez hasn’t had the most consistent year for the Mets. His best contribution may very well have been his advice handed off to Mark Vientos. Undoubtedly a wise addition regardless of the lessened power he has added after a remarkably powerful one with the Los Angeles Dodgers, Martinez always seemed like a one-year option for the Mets. This hasn’t changed a bit.

The negative of carrying a DH-exclusive player on the roster was always the biggest reason to stay away from Martinez in the first place. He’s the kind of guy you have to play every day or at least close to it. In some cases, it works well. See Shohei Ohtani on the Dodgers this season for a perfect example of what a dream DH looks like.

This year’s Mets could benefit from having the DH spot open. Allowing Starling Marte to take a half-day or giving Francisco Lindor the opportunity to hit but not have to worry about playing defense would be welcomed. Especially on a roster where Jose Iglesias was one of the team’s hottest hitters for weeks, this would have been one of the easiest ways to get him into the lineup more often.

Martinez’s age is one of the biggest reasons why a reunion seems unlikely. A freshly turned 37 (and father), he looks his age and then some way too often. We’re happy with what he has offered. We can happily wish him well when his contract expires and he looks for a new destination. Any newfound dad strength he may gain should be put to use this year. By the time he gets to 2025, Martinez might feel the aches of being the dad to an infant whose endless energy never ceases.

manual

Next