Skip to main content

The NY Mets trade train that led them to their new number one prospect

How did we get here?
Knoxville Smokies infielder Jefferson Rojas during a minor league game between the Knoxville Smokies and Biloxi Shuckers at Covenant Health Park in Knoxville, Tenn., on July 7, 2026.
Knoxville Smokies infielder Jefferson Rojas during a minor league game between the Knoxville Smokies and Biloxi Shuckers at Covenant Health Park in Knoxville, Tenn., on July 7, 2026. | USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect

The New York Mets did what they could to salvage a deeply disappointing 2026 season last month with a trade deadline fire sale that saw them ship out a number of veterans from their roster. Those deals injected plenty of young talent into their farm system, but none was more impressive than infield prospect Jefferson Rojas, who was a consensus top-100 talent with the Cubs before being dealt.

While most of the focus, naturally, has been on the deal between the Cubs and Mets that actually brought Rojas into the organization, the roots of this trade go a lot deeper than the surface level. A series of transactions that starts all the way back in the 2021-22 offseason led the Mets to Rojas, and a look at those deals should serve as a worthwhile reminder for Mets fans that it takes a very long time to see all the implications of any deal made in baseball.

In December 2021, the Mets kicked off the process that would eventually lead them to Rojas by signing veteran infielder Eduardo Escobar to a two-year deal. Escobar was a decent but overpaid hitter for the Mets, as he posted a 103 wRC+ in 176 games for the club while raking in a $40 million contract. Come June 2023, New York was ready to move on and shipped Escobar to the Angels for a pair of pitching prospects: Coleman Crow and Landon Marceaux.

Marceaux retired from professional baseball without ever making the majors, while Crow didn't even suit up for the Mets in an official game at any level during his time in the organization. That might make the deal sound like a bust, but the reality is that Crow was dealt to Milwaukee just six months after being acquired from Anaheim in a deal that brought back two veteran players: Adrian Houser and Tyrone Taylor.

Houser was brought in to provide some rotation depth for the Mets, but it was actually Taylor who ended up offering the most value to New York. In 310 games for the club between 2024 and 2026, Taylor contributed 48 doubles, 19 homers, 23 steals, and more than a thousand innings of quality defense in center field (not to mention strong work in the outfield corners as well).

By the time of this year's trade deadline, it was clear that the Mets would be moving Taylor. He was raking with an OPS pushing .800 and he was already ticketed for free agency in November. That led fans to wonder less about if he'd be trading and worry more about whether he could come back to bite them if traded to the wrong team. Fortunately, the trade president of baseball operations David Stearns managed to execute looks like a clear win.

While no one should mistake the fact that Clay Holmes was the central piece in the Rojas trade, it seems unlikely that the Cubs would've given up a prospect of Rojas's caliber for one player who's likely to hit free agency after the season. Adding Taylor into the deal was the secret ingredient necessary to convince Chicago to pull the trigger on giving up such a prized prospect. For that, in a roundabout way, Mets fans ought to thank old friend Eduardo Escobar.

Jefferson Rojas's complicated trade tree shows how hard it is to evaluate trades

The long and winding road the Mets took to acquire Rojas shows how long trades and even free agent signings can take to play out in full. There's all sorts of ripple effects to be considered when reflecting on past deals, to the point where some trades can never be fully litigated. That's a reality that fans can view as alternately encouraging or deeply worrisome.

On one hand, perhaps Mets fans can rest easier about middling trade returns for players like Luke Weaver knowing that additional, unforeseen value could be coming down the line. On the other hand, it's worth remembering that Rojas is not yet an impactful MLB piece despite all the talent he has and the hype surrounding him. That means what looks like a brilliant trade for Stearns now could turn out to be a deep disappointment in just a few short years.

After all, Rojas wouldn't be the first top-100 prospect to fizzle out without making an impact. Even just looking at top prospects recently traded by the Cubs, Cam Smith has yet to do much of anything with the Astros despite being the crown jewel of their trade return for Kyle Tucker. He's got more than 250 MLB games in the books with an OPS below .700 as a corner outfielder. If 2029 rolls around and Rojas has still yet to post a quality offensive season in the majors, this trade tree will look much worse.

For now, all the Mets can do is hope that their belief in Rojas isn't misplaced, and he'll be successful enough that we look back on this series of deals with fondness rather than regret. To his credit, he's certainly off to a good start with an OPS north of .800 and seven extra-base hits in his first 13 games with the organization at the Double-A level.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations