David Wright is right but also wrong about his NY Mets captain interpretation

David Wright likes the comments. But is he right?
Jul 19, 2025; New York City, New York, USA; New York Mets former third baseman David Wright speaks during a press conference before having his number retired by the Mets before a game against the Cincinnati Reds at Citi Field. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images
Jul 19, 2025; New York City, New York, USA; New York Mets former third baseman David Wright speaks during a press conference before having his number retired by the Mets before a game against the Cincinnati Reds at Citi Field. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-Imagn Images | Brad Penner-Imagn Images

When Steve Cohen declared there’d never be a New York Mets captain under his watch, it seemed like a veiled attempt to shut a few theories down. Was it a statement toward Francisco Lindor and his failed leadership? Is he merely trying to end a conversation that seems to come up annually? Maybe the truth is Cohen actually believes ewing a C on a baseball jersey is silly. He had to make his billions somewhere. Saving on stitching is a start.

One of the most important people to weigh in on the topic, David Wright, addressed it. He took the high road, interpreting it in the most politically correct way he could.

Nice one, Captain America. While a distinct possibility, it’s a way of saying a few other things that might not be so true.

The truth about the Mets captain is somewhere in the middle

Do the Mets have other players capable of being captains in the locker room? One would hope so. Marcus Semien comes with the reputation as a locker room leader. He was practically the Texas Rangers captain much like Brandon Nimmo was thought of as a Mets leader behind-the-scenes only amplified.

Juan Soto as the most highly-paid player on the team needs to show some level of being a leader. Carson Benge mentioning him as someone who has been helpful in camp is a nice start.

The Mets don’t have nearly as many leaders as Wright is making it out to be. Many of the major players on this club are new or too green to be leadership material. This is officially a Lindor-led team with Soto having free reign to voice whatever opinion he wants. Oh, and they have Semien there as well to provide any sort of olive branch between the two, whether needed or not.

Wright’s “many leaders” interpretation doesn’t seem completely true when there really aren’t too many others. Sure, Sean Manaea has regularly received praise from young pitchers for helping them out. Freddy Peralta is fitting in nicely. For the year or so we get out of Bo Bichette, he’ll have an impact.

It just doesn’t seem like Wright read the Cohen statement in full truth. Going back to 2019, there have been demands of a new captain following Wright’s retirement. The rookie version of Pete Alonso, Michael Conforto in his best years, and later Lindor have all been considerations. There’s Nimmo, too. Who could even forget when some believed Dominic Smith was captain material after having basically just three good months in the majors?

Isn’t too many leaders kind of what led to the Mets breaking up the team after the 2025 season? All rumors, it was a situation where players like Nimmo, Alonso, and Jeff McNeil probably didn’t need to “look up to” someone like Lindor.

Some locker rooms certainly can benefit from multiple leaders. Others might need one or two voices. Wright’s comments sit in line with what the Mets decided to do, as an ex-captain who has done nothing but represent the organization perfectly would say.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations