New York Mets: Three pleasant surprises from the 2020 season

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 07: Erasmo Ramirez #43 of the New York Mets in action against the Philadelphia Phillies at Citi Field on September 07, 2020 in New York City. The Phillies defeated the Mets 9-8 in ten innings. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 07: Erasmo Ramirez #43 of the New York Mets in action against the Philadelphia Phillies at Citi Field on September 07, 2020 in New York City. The Phillies defeated the Mets 9-8 in ten innings. (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images)
3 of 3
Next
WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 24: David Peterson #77 of the New York Mets pitches in the first inning against the Washington Nationals at Nationals Park on September 24, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Patrick McDermott/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC – SEPTEMBER 24: David Peterson #77 of the New York Mets pitches in the first inning against the Washington Nationals at Nationals Park on September 24, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Patrick McDermott/Getty Images) /

In another season without postseason baseball for the New York Mets, there were some positive takeaways from the 2020 season.

So, the New York Mets were eliminated from postseason contention on Saturday, September 26. In a season where over half of the teams in each league qualified for the playoffs, the Mets could never string together enough quality starting pitching, timely hitting, and sound defense to eke out a .500 record. By all accounts, it was a failed season for the team as a whole.

Still, it wasn’t all bad for the Amazins this year. The fact that MLB even got through the 60 game season amidst the pandemic was remarkable, which allowed several new stars to emerge in Flushing. Some were promising prospects who got called up earlier than anyone anticipated. Others were front office signings that (gasp!) actually worked out.

Either way you look at it, the Mets had a losing record in 2020, but there were a lot of players that were unexpectedly fun to watch. Let’s take a look at a few of those players that made the 2020 season a bit brighter for the Flushing Faithful. For the purposes of this list, I’m focusing on Mets players who either weren’t in the organization or were not at the major league level in 2019.

David Peterson

Before this season began, I wrote about David Peterson as a Mets minor leaguer I was excited about in 2020. Back in March, I did not expect him to be an integral part of the rotation, since at that time Marcus Stroman and Noah Syndergaard were still expected to be core pieces of the starting five.

As dominoes began to fall from the Mets’ 2020 starting rotation, Peterson quickly moved up on the team depth chart. He made his first major league start just five games into the season against the Boston Red Sox on July 28. He was extremely impressive in his debut, going 5 2/3 innings and giving up just two runs while striking out three. Peterson was the first Mets starter to win his debut since Steven Matz in 2015, and became the first southpaw debuting at Fenway Park to last at least five innings in 18 years.

In his truncated rookie season, Peterson pitched like an experienced veteran. His control sometimes wavered, leading to traffic on the basepaths, but he made a habit of baring down with runners on base and getting key outs. In ten starts, he allowed more than three earned runs only once. His last outing, against the Washington Nationals on September 24, was his longest and best of the season. On that night, Peterson went seven innings of one-run ball to earn a victory and momentarily keep the Mets’ playoff hopes alive.

Peterson may not have the world’s most overpowering pitching arsenal, but he demonstrated mental toughness in his rookie season. He did what many Mets starters in 2020 failed to do; he limited the damage when it mattered most. All of this led to a 6-2 record and a solid 3.44 ERA for Peterson.

With the Mets rotation somewhat up in the air for 2021, Peterson figures to have earned a spot in next year’s starting five with his admirable performance this year.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 19: Andres Gimenez #60 of the New York Mets runs to home during the fourth inning against the Atlanta Braves at Citi Field on September 19, 2020 in the Queens borough of New York City. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 19: Andres Gimenez #60 of the New York Mets runs to home during the fourth inning against the Atlanta Braves at Citi Field on September 19, 2020 in the Queens borough of New York City. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images) /

Andrés Giménez

The Mets went into 2020 with Amed Rosario cemented as their starting shortstop and Andrés Giménez as a prospect who had never played above Double-A Binghamton. When the Mets announced their 30-man roster on July 23, the inclusion of Giménez was almost universally regarded as a “surprise” by the Mets Twitterverse.

Even Giménez himself did not expect to make the team out of “Summer Camp.”

Giménez was thrown into major league action right away, as a defensive replacement for Robinson Cano in the Mets’ first game of the year, and he never looked back. With the bat, Giménez consistently made solid contact and used speed to his advantage, swiping eight bases in 48 games played. He did not display much power in 2020, hitting only three home runs, but every one of them tied their respective games.

With the glove, Giménez was masterful. He provided solid defense at shortstop, second base, and third base, and frequently made highlight-reel plays at shortstop in particular.

The Mets were not a defensively impressive team in 2020, but even with that low bar, Giménez was clearly an excellent defender. So much so, he essentially wrestled the starting job away from Rosario and played all nine (or seven, depending on the day) innings for nearly every game in September.

Both Rosario and Giménez are under team control for several more years, so it will be fascinating to see what the Mets do with them next year. Giménez looks to be capable of playing shortstop, second base, or third base whenever asked, and rumors have swirled about whether Rosario will have to learn center field to remain valuable to the Mets going forward. After the 2020 season, one thing is for sure: Andrés Giménez has played his way into a roster spot in 2021.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 19: Erasmo Ramirez #43 of the New York Mets reacts pitches during the ninth inning against the Atlanta Braves at Citi Field on September 19, 2020 in the Queens borough of New York City. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 19: Erasmo Ramirez #43 of the New York Mets reacts pitches during the ninth inning against the Atlanta Braves at Citi Field on September 19, 2020 in the Queens borough of New York City. (Photo by Sarah Stier/Getty Images) /

Erasmo Ramirez

With the fantastic multi-inning appearances that Erasmo Ramirez delivered for the Mets in 2020, it is a wonder that he never started a game for them. The Mets signed Ramirez earlier this year, marking his first stint with a National League club after spending his entire career in the American League with the Red Sox, Seattle Mariners, and Tampa Bay Rays up to that point. He had started 92 games in his career, but this year excelled in long relief for the Amazins.

Ramirez spent much of the early part of the season at the alternate site. The Mets recalled him on September 4, and he made his first appearance against the Philadelphia Phillies on September 7. He came on in relief of David Peterson, who suffered his worst start of the year and lasted only two innings while surrendering five runs. Ramirez pitched innings three through seven, giving up only one run on two hits and allowing the Mets to get themselves back in the game (they ended up losing in ten innings).

That was the only run Ramirez gave up in September. He made five more scoreless appearances for the Mets this season, notching one save when he pitched the final three innings of the Mets’ 18-1 blowout of the Toronto Blue Jays on September 11. Throughout it all, Ramirez was always fired up on the field, especially when his fielders made key plays behind him.

I am still wrapping my head around the fact that Robert Gsellman and Ariel Jurado (remember him?) were somehow higher on the starting pitcher depth chart than Ramirez. I would love if the Mets brought Ramirez back, even on a minor league deal, in 2021. He did not pitch that many games in 2020, but he demonstrated that the Mets could rely on him to induce soft contact and get outs when needed.

Next. Who will be the Mets' first baseman in 2021?

Want your voice heard? Join the Rising Apple team!

Write for us!

Back in February and March, none of these three players figured to be a huge factor for the 2020 Mets. Once the COVID-shortened baseball season became a reality, all three played an important role for the Amazins. Their contributions were not quite enough to vault the Mets into a postseason berth, but they were enjoyable to watch and gave Mets fans something to smile about in a very difficult year.

Next