Feb 26, 2014; Port St Lucie, FL, USA; New York Mets shortstop Ruben Tejada (11) poses during media day at Tradition Field. Mandatory Credit: Brad Barr-USA TODAY Sports

The Symbolism of Ruben Tejada


As the Mets play their last exhibition game, the reality of the team’s shortstop situation is setting in. Though Sandy Alderson had publicly stated that upgrading shortstop was an offseason priority, the Mets will once again go with Ruben Tejada.

The reaction to this among the fan base, though somewhat divided, is generally not positive. Part of the reason for this is that though Tejada had a decent 2012 (.289/.333/.351), he has struggled mightily since then (most recently hitting .190 during spring training with 4 errors). Another part of the reaction likely stems from the implied reasons why Tejada is being given another chance as the starting job.

The Mets repeatedly claim that they’re over their financial constraints. A recent story indicated that there were bank-imposed salary restrictions on the team, and that those restrictions have been lifted (along with the re-financing of a large loan). However, Stephen Drew remains available on the free-agent market, and the Mets have refrained from signing him. Certainly the demands of Drew and his agent, Scott Boras, are somewhat unreasonable, but the Mets did offer him $9.5 million for a single season. The Mets’ refusal to go higher/longer with Drew clearly is partially driven by finances (along with Drew’s demands). Therefore, Tejada’s being the starting shortstop serves as a reminder that perhaps the financial issues are not gone. Worse, it symbolizes that frugal spending may be the team’s course indefinitely, making winning that much more difficult.

Sandy Alderson had other opportunities to address shortstop via the trade route. We heard about Nick Franklin and Didi Gregorius all spring, yet nothing happened. Alderson, reportedly, did not want to send a young pitcher to Seattle or Arizona for a shortstop. This sends a message to the fans. The message is that perhaps the team does not feel that it’s ready to compete in 2014, and may be holding its prospects for moves to be made after the 2014 season. This may be prudent, but it’s a tough sell to a fan base that has not seen a winning team since 2008. The fans are tired of waiting. The organization wants the fans to be excited about 2014, but how can Sandy and company realistically expect that to happen when the organization’s inactivity suggests that it isn’t doing what it takes to win this year?

Ruben Tejada may have a bounce-back season in 2014. I’ve seen nothing to suggest that he will. What I have seen is an organizational reluctance to address shortstop (after identifying it as a primary need). Maybe this is a product of financial hardships yet unresolved. Maybe it’s a product of an organzational belief that the team’s time has not yet come. In either case, when the Mets take the field on Monday, Ruben Tejada will remind me that both of these things are very real.

 

Thanks for reading! Be sure to follow@RisingAppleBlog on Twitter and Instagram, and Like Rising Apple’s Facebook page to keep up with the latest news, rumors, and opinion.

 

Next Mets Game View full schedule »
Saturday, Aug 3030 Aug7:10Philadelphia PhilliesBuy Tickets

Tags: Didi Gregorius Nick Franklin Ruben Tejada

  • MDonaldWilpon

    Perhaps the Mets should go with the George Costanza approach… if everything they do is wrong, perhaps they should try the opposite of what they do….

  • Pentax Shooter

    I don’t care about “symbolism”. What I do care about is the terms under which S. Drew is willing to be employed. Last I heard, he wanted a 2 yr/$14M contract with a player option following year one, so he could leave/demand a raise if he has a good year, and if he plays poorly he can keep the Mets on the hook for his over-inflated salary. He’s also 31 yrs old and has been barely average for 2 of the last 3 seasons. It would be irresponsible for Alderson to sign him under these circumstances.

    Why would Alderson send a young pitcher to Seatle for Nick Franklin, who does not even project as a long-term shortstop due to limited range and arm strength?

    Didi Gregorius? Really? Dude is a career .250-ish hitter in the minors.

    Doing something just for the sake of doing something is irresponsible. That’s the “message” I’m getting from Sandy Alderson.

  • LIPAUL

    I would not trade one of my pitchers for Gregorious or Franklin. And the most id give drew is a one year deal

  • Not4Nutten

    Both Ruben and Ike’s body language tells it all, Get Me Outta Here!!!!! They are fried, well done, while every Manager in the Majors encourages their Young Players both Sandy and Terry Discourage them, and not far behind is Larges, Wheeler and Travis! In three years they have burned out Every decent arm and developed nobody, not one Young Player! Yea Ike and Ruben have Issues, but they won’t be resolved in Citi Morgue!!!!!!

  • Not4Nutten

    Lets Go Mets!!!!!!!!!!