Oct 30, 2013; Boston, MA, USA; Boston Red Sox shortstop Stephen Drew celebrates after hitting a solo home run against the St. Louis Cardinals in the fourth inning during game six of the MLB baseball World Series at Fenway Park. Mandatory Credit: Bob DeChiara-USA TODAY Sports

Stephen Drew, Bartolo Colon, and $10 Million

Last weekend, the Mets signed John Lannan and Omar Quintanilla to minor league deals. Other than that, it has been a fairly quiet month for the Mets, after their early off-season acquisitions of Chris Young, Curtis Granderson, and Bartolo Colon. The main story involving the Mets right now is their somewhat passive pursuit of shortstop Stephen Drew. The common opinion is that the Mets are interested in Drew on a short-term deal, and are willing to go no more than two years. Drew’s agent, Scott Boras, is shopping his client, hoping to land a longer-term deal. And there’s always the possibility that Drew might return to the Red Sox, even on a one or two-year deal.

The Mets, reports say, like Drew, “but only to a point”. There could be a few reasons for this. The most likely is that the Mets see the opportunity to land a better shortstop in the next year or two, hence their reluctance to go beyond two years for Drew. Next year’s shortstop free-agent class (for now) includes Hanley Ramirez, Jed Lowrie, Asdrubal Cabrera, and Yunel Escobar. There’s a fair chance that some or all of these players may not become free agents. Looking at the list, other than Ramirez, this list of possible free agents lacks star power.

The Mets could hope to trade for an impact shortstop in the next year or two, but players such as Troy Tulowitzski (a name commonly mentioned) will be expensive, both in players needed to go the other way and salary.

Another reason the Mets may be hesitating on a multiple-year deal with Drew is the development of internal candidates to take the shortstop position. Gavin Cecchini is the organization’s best prospect at the position, but he is still a few years away, having ascended only as high as Brooklyn. Then there’s the third reason the Mets may be slow to sign Drew, the financial situation.

The Mets’ payroll for 2014 is currently projected at around $86M. Signing Drew would likely push that figure close to $100M for 2014.

We don’t know if the Mets are or are not willing to go that high. Whether or not they should is a topic for another discussion. However, it is reasonable to assume that the payroll is a factor in the Mets’ thinking, given the recent difficulties they’ve had in that area. This brings the discussion to whether or not the $86 million is being allocated as well as it could be. The Mets will be paying Bartolo Colon $10 million in 2014, hoping that the 41-year-old will come close to his 2013 production of 18-6 with a 2.65 ERA. If he does (and rumor is that he may start opening day), then the $10 million would be money well spent. However, if he does not, Sandy Alderson will be open to questions about why he chose to invest in Colon, when starting pitching (even without Matt Harvey) is the team’s strength.

The Mets could have given Rafael Montero or Jacob deGrom s a shot at the 2014 rotation. These guys may not be ready, but many argued that Dwight Gooden was not ready in 1984, and we all know what he did. Would it have been better to go with an internal candidate (backed up by Carlos Torres) and allocate the $10 million to a shortstop upgrade?

The way it stands now, Ruben Tejada will be the starting shortstop this year. Tejada’s struggles in 2013 have been well documented. His .202 average and .259 OBP were accumulated over 208 at-bats, slightly less 20% of his career. Tejada has a career UZR of 1.1, suggesting that he is an average fielder to go along with his offensive statistics.

The primary concern with Tejada is the limitation of his baseball skills (he neither hits for power nor runs well). Teams will often remain patient with a struggling player in whom they see the skills for him to develop and thrive. Does Tejada warrant such patience? Stephen Drew is not an elite shortstop. However, his 2013 slash line of .253/.333/.443, 13 home runs, and 5.3 UZR would be a significant upgrade. The Mets are aware of this, yet seem unwilling to budge and offer Drew a multiple-year deal.

We can only speculate on why the Mets are taking a hard line on Drew. There may be a trade in the works, or perhaps they’re holding out hope that Tejada can revert to his 2012 form (.289 average). However, if finances are driving their position, time will tell if they have allocated their resources wisely.

Would you have spent $10 million on Colon, or used that money to seek an upgrade at shortstop?


Thanks for reading! Be sure to follow@RisingAppleBlog on Twitter and Instagram, and Like Rising Apple’s Facebook page to keep up with the latest news, rumors, and opinion.

Next Mets Game View full schedule »
Saturday, Aug 2323 Aug6:10at Los Angeles DodgersBuy Tickets

Tags: Bartolo Colon New York Mets Ruben Tejada Stephen Drew

  • Ken Meoni

    I know alot of people on here like Colon. I don’t. There were other options out there if they wanted pitching. First the roids. You don’t know what he will be without roids. Second, his age. Those are two huge factors.

    I think the Mets should wait on a SS. I would really like to see Asdrubal Cabrera playing SS for them. There were rumors of him also being available via trade this year. The Mets may want to check that out and trade away some of their surplus players. Then sign him to an extention. In all the moves they have made, we are still waiting on trades.

    • Rich S

      I agree, Ken. I still don’t agree with ther Colon signing, when they could have gone cheaper (and younger) on the mound, and gotten some help at SS. And I agree with your points on his age/PEDs, and how those things make him quite a risk.

    • ThatGuyWhoLeavesComments

      What cheaper, younger options would you have preferred? Other than a reclamation project like Dan Haren, who still got $10 million, who was worth the money?

      Pelfrey – 2/$11M
      Kazmir – 2/$22
      Huges – 3/$24
      Vargas – 4/$32
      Nolasco – 4/$49
      Colon – 2/$20

      Tell me again who was worth the money. Best case scenario? Colon repeats or gets close to his 2013 numbers (a decent chance considering he’ll be pitching at Citi). Worst case? He doesn’t and the Mets trade him to a team in the playoff race, a la Carlos Beltran, except this time teams will get a second year instead of a half. They won’t get the same return, but a two-year deal at $20 million for Colon is hardly the gamble you’re all making it out to be.

    • Rich S

      I was advocating going in a different direction. Sign Lannan, and one or two more (maybe Capuano) to minor league deals to compete with Mejia for the 5th spot. Give Montero a shot at 4. Your logic about Colon is seriously flawed. If he does not succeed, tell me again what team will trade for a 41-year-old, who is overweight and coming off of a PED suspension? If Colon fails, the Mets are stuck with him to the tune of $20M on a cash-strapped team.

    • ThatGuyWhoLeavesComments

      Montero probably will get a spot in the rotation, but not straight out of camp for the same reason you didn’t see Harvey and Wheeler straight out of camp. Sandy has already said Montero will get his shot, maybe even Syndergaard. And they did sign Lannan, so there you go! You were right!

      What team will trade for a guy coming off a PED suspension? I don’t know. But seeing as how a team was more than willing to give a guy coming off a PED suspension a 4-year contract, I think we could find someone. And you really think a team looking to make the playoffs is going to care if Colon is overweight or underweight, black, white or purple? I don’t.

      I’d rather be stuck with Colon for two years at $20 million than Huges or Vargas at three and four years, respectively. The point being Colon’s deal is a steal compared with the market for pitching this offseason.

    • Rich S

      Your point on trading was predicated on his not succeeding. If that is the case, and he’s 3-8 with 4.50 ERA at the break, and you add in the PEDs and his physical condition, do you see a contender taking him? I don’t.

    • ThatGuyWhoLeavesComments

      Well, I guess that’s where we disagree. And it doesn’t have to be him not succeeding. It could also be the Mets far out of contention (does anyone doubt that?) with a healthy starting pitcher to trade.