Sep 29, 2013; New York, NY, USA; New York Mets former catcher Mike Piazza speaks during his induction into the Mets Hall of Fame prior to the game against the Milwaukee Brewers at Citi Field. Mandatory Credit: Brad Penner-USA TODAY Sports

Dan Shaughnessy's Hall Of Fame Ballot Is A Disgrace


Earlier today, Boston Globe columnist Dan Shaughnessy unveiled his Hall of Fame ballot.  He voted for five players (the maximum is 10).  The players on Shaughnessy’s ballot are Jack Morris, Curt Schilling, Frank Thomas, Greg Maddux, and Tom Glavine.

Absent are Mike Piazza, Jeff Bagwell, Craig Biggio, and Tim Raines, who most feel are deserving of enshrinement.

In the case of Raines, Shaugnessy wrote that he simply doesn’t pass Shaughnessy’s highly scientific “I know it when I see it test.”

Raines’ case has been bolstered in recent years by those who analyze statistics that weren’t highly valued back in the 70s and 80s, but Shaugnessy is clearly not someone who analyzes anything.

When it came to the omission of both Piazza and Bagwell, Shaugnessy made a complete fool of himself by stating the following:

I don’t vote for the PED guys, so it’s easy to say no to Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, McGwire, and Palmeiro. They have positive tests and/or admissions and/or multiple appearances in the Mitchell Report. Piazza and Bagwell have none of that. They just don’t look right.

“They just don’t look right.”

That’s the extent of Shaugnessy’s reasoning behind keeping two deserving players off his Hall of Fame ballot.

Shaughnessy didn’t even levy baseless accusations against Piazza or Bagwell, he just thinks that they “don’t look right.”

I’d love to hear exactly what doesn’t “look right” about Piazza.

Is it the fact that there isn’t a shred of evidence linking him to the use of illegal performance enhancing drugs?  Is it the fact that, after years of some voters being skeptical because Piazza wasn’t adamant enough about his innocence, Piazza went into great detail while denying that he ever used any illegal performance enhancing drugs?  Is it the fact that Piazza’s numbers never suspiciously spiked (in either direction)?  Is it the fact that Piazza’s body never changed dramatically during his career?

In his pathetic excuse at an explanation, Shaugnessy noted that Frank Thomas had a “Popeye” body, but that since he was never accused of using steroids, he had Shaughnessy’s vote.

Shaughnessy is someone who obviously knows that anyone can make an accusation (baseless or not) against anyone for anything.  Want an example? Frank Thomas used steroids. Everyone knows it.  See?  I just made that up, but now that someone has made an accusation against Thomas, perhaps Shaughnessy will re-think his vote.

A shade over 11 percent of the ballots have been counted, and Mike Piazza has appeared on 70.3 percent of them.  It’s likely that Piazza will either just make it or just miss out on election in 2014.  If he misses out, obtuse people like Shaughnessy will be the reason why.  And it’s a damn shame.

 

Thanks for reading! Be sure to follow @RisingAppleBlog on Twitter and Instagram, and Like Rising Apple’s Facebook page to keep up with the latest news, rumors, and opinion.

Next Mets Game View full schedule »
Tuesday, Sep 22 Sep7:10at Miami MarlinsBuy Tickets

Tags: Dan Shaughnessy Mike Piazza New York Mets

  • AceRuby

    Mike definitely deserves the Hall of Fame nod and I agree this guy shouldn’t really be voting for the Hall of Fame with those clueless comments.

    • Ken Meoni

      Totally agree. You are right on Danny.

  • chums41

    Piazza should have gotten in his first year of eligibility. He is the most prolific hitting catcher in modern day baseball. His hitting stats are superior and/or equal to Johnny Bench in every major category and while Bench was one of the leaders of his Reds’ team, Piazza was the leader of both the Dodgers and Mets teams. While Shaughnessy”s comments show immense ignorance and immaturity, the fact is that Mike should be on everyone’s ballot and if not, that is simply a travesty.