Sep 25, 2013; Bronx, NY, USA; New York Yankees center fielder Curtis Granderson (14) advances to third during the fourth inning against the Tampa Bay Rays at Yankee Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Anthony Gruppuso-USA TODAY Sports

Mets Agree to 4 Year Deal with Curtis Granderson

UPDATED, 12/8:

According to Jon Heyman of CBS Sports, the monetary breakdown of Curtis Granderson’s contract will be as follows:

Paying Granderson $13 million in 2014 gives the Mets another $2 million to work with this offseason.

It was also a smart move on Sandy Alderson’s part to not backload this deal – note that Granderson will earn less in the last year of the deal than in years two and three.


According to multiple reports, the Mets and Curtis Granderson have agreed to a four year deal.  Joel Sherman of the New York Post appeared to have the news first:

According to Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports, the deal is worth $60 million ($15 million annually).  It’s not yet known if the contract is frontloaded, backloaded, or evenly distributed.

Welcome to the Mets, Curtis!


This move is bigger than just the Mets signing Granderson.

It signals that the team is again ready to be serious in free agency (even it it’s not for the best of the best just yet).

The Mets are at a stage where they need to begin to add significant pieces that cost tens of millions of dollars, and Granderson certainly qualifies.

There were many who doubted whether the Mets would do anything big this offseason, and those doubts have now been answered.

Let’s hope this is just another step, since the roster as currently constructed is not yet in position to be a contender.


Thanks for reading! Be sure to follow@RisingAppleBlog on Twitter and Instagram, and Like Rising Apple’s Facebook page to keep up with the latest news, rumors, and opinion.

Next Mets Game View full schedule »
Friday, Aug 2222 Aug7:10at Los Angeles DodgersBuy Tickets

Tags: Curtis Granderson New York Mets

  • Joe.02

    “More to come” also has to include bats. Young is a minor if hopefully useful if overpriced move. This is a good move. But, it isn’t enough. It’s a start.

  • BklynCowpoke

    Maybe they will move the fences at Citifield in again :)

  • Kabeetz

    This is the first relevant move in years. Good, bad, poor, wise…. It is the first step to the team moving towards relevance.

    If season ticket sales and attendance increase THAT will inspire ownership and management to move further in this direction.

    If this spending leads to a negligible effect on revenues then they might revert to their pinching pennies as long as the debt situation remains unsolved.

  • Ken Meoni

    Yes!! Now for the Trade(s).

  • Ken Meoni

    The Yanks also lose Cano. :)

  • Pingback: New York Mets: Getting Better - District on Deck - A Washington Nationals Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More